Alpha Adventure Treks and Expedition Pvt. Ltd.

The announcement that Nepal will waive climbing permit fees for 97 peaks marks a major shift in the country’s mountaineering and tourism policy. The decision isn’t just headline-grabbing: it reflects a strategic effort to redirect climbing traffic, support remote communities and promote lesser-known Himalayan summits. This article unpacks the key aspects of the “Nepal waives climbing permit fees for 97 peaks” programme — what it means, why it’s happening, the conditions, opportunities for climbers and the challenges that come with it.

What exactly happened?

Key decision details

• On 17 July 2025, the Nepali government approved a policy that permits will be waived for 97 Himalayan peaks for a two-year period.
• These peaks are located primarily in the remote provinces of Karnali Province (77 peaks) and Sudurpashchim Province (20 peaks).
• The peaks range in elevation roughly from 5,870 metres (19,258 feet) up to 7,132 metres (23,398 feet).
• Meanwhile, climbing permit fees for more popular mountains (including Mount Everest) are being raised. For example, Everest fees will go from US$11,000 to US$15,000 in the popular April-May season.
• The waiver programme is explicitly aimed at boosting tourism in remote, under-developed regions and promoting “off-the-beaten-track” climbing.

Why did Nepal waive climbing permit fees for 97 peaks?

Diversifying mountaineering traffic

The primary motivation is to redirect climbers away from the overcrowded mainstream peaks and towards lesser-visited regions. As one tourism official put it:

“The idea is to encourage climbers to go to unexplored yet scenic areas and mountain peaks.”

By doing so, Nepal hopes to reduce pressure on popular routes (both environmental and logistical) and spread tourism benefits more broadly.

Economic and regional development

The provinces of Karnali and Sudurpashchim are among the country’s most remote and least developed. According to reporting:

• These areas have “scarcely visited” peaks and poor infrastructure.
• The government hopes the fee waiver will create jobs, generate income and strengthen local economies in those provinces.

Managing Everest and other major peaks

At the same time that the waiver was announced, Nepal is increasing permit fees for its most prominent peaks. This dual strategy helps to:

• Deter some of the overwhelming numbers of climbers heading to Everest.
• Provide an incentive for climbers to consider other summits.
• Ensure the revenue from major peaks remains robust while giving alternatives to the climbing community.

Training ground and regulatory linkage

There’s also a regulatory angle: Nepal is considering requiring that climbers attempting Everest have first summited a 7,000-metre peak. Some of the waived 97 peaks are around or above that threshold (e.g., Api Himal at 7,132 m).

What it means for climbers

Opportunity for adventure on “hidden peaks”

For mountaineers seeking something different, the “Nepal waives climbing permit fees for 97 peaks” initiative opens up major new possibilities:

• Peaks in the 5,800-7,100 m range that were previously little visited.
• The chance to explore remote corners of Nepal not saturated with commercial expedition traffic.
• Potentially lower overall costs for climbing permit royalties (though other costs remain).

But it’s not totally “free climbing”

Important caveats:

• The waiver is for royalty or permit-fee components, but many other costs (liaison officers, insurance, logistics, transport, guide/porter services) still apply. Experts point out the royalty fee is often a small part of total costs.
• Access to these remote regions is more challenging: limited infrastructure, fewer services, longer travel time from base (Kathmandu) to climbing approach.
• The waiver is for two years only, so climbers should act within that window if they want this benefit.

Strategic considerations for climbing

If “Nepal waives climbing permit fees for 97 peaks” is the policy, then climbers should:

1. Choose a peak from the 97-list (confirm whether your chosen one is included)
2. Factor in approach logistics (remote western provinces may require flights, longer drives, less support)
3. Budget for full expedition costs, not just permit fees
4. Consider skill/experience level: remote peaks may require self-sufficiency and technical ability
5. Check that support services (guides, porters, gear, evacuation) are available in the region

Impact on Nepal’s tourism and mountain-economy

Spread of tourism development

By opening up new climbing destinations, Nepal hopes to reduce its reliance on the well-worn trekking and climbing circuits and spread tourism revenues to more remote areas. That can lead to:

• Increased job opportunities for local guides, porters, lodges, transport services.
• Greater awareness and appreciation of the natural landscapes of Karnali and Sudurpashchim.
• Reduced crowding and environmental strain on the popular peaks.

Financial and ecological balancing act

While the waiver removes one fee, Nepal still depends on climbing permit revenues (e.g., Everest and popular peaks). According to one source the climbing fees generated about US$5.9 million last year with Everest making up over three-quarters of that.
By raising fees on Everest while waiving the lesser peaks, Nepal seems to be re-balancing its mountaineering economy.

Infrastructure challenge

However, the impact will depend on the infrastructure catch-up. Experts warn that the remote western areas may lack the necessary services and support for a surge in mountaineering tourism.
If access remains difficult and services limited, the waiver alone may not be enough to attract large numbers of climbers.

What are the terms and conditions?

Duration

The permit fee waiver applies for two years, starting from the official approval.

Geographical and altitude scope

The 97 waived peaks are specifically in Karnali and Sudurpashchim provinces. They range from 5,870 m to 7,132 m.

What is waived

The waiver relates to royalty/permit fees for the peaks in question. It does not necessarily cover all costs associated with climbing (logistics, guide/porter fees, insurance, etc.).

What remains unchanged or increased

• For other peaks (outside the 97-list), permit fees have been increased – e.g., smaller mountains rising from US$250 to US$350.
• Everest permit fees will rise significantly.

Opportunities and caveats

Opportunities

• Less crowded environment: Climbers willing to venture to remote western Nepal can avoid traffic jams seen on Everest and other popular peaks.
• Unique landscapes: The western Himalayas offer pristine, less-explored terrain with spectacular scenery.
• Cost savings: For the permit component at least, there is a tangible saving when “Nepal waives climbing permit fees for 97 peaks.”
• Training for bigger peaks: Some of the waived peaks are around 7,000 m; these could function as stepping-stones for climbers aiming for higher goals (especially if the proposed law requiring a 7,000 m summit before Everest passes).

Caveats

• Infrastructure and support: Remote regions may lack robust rescue/emergency services, lodging, transport, communications. This raises risk and cost.
• Access difficulties: Getting to the base of these peaks may involve longer, harder travel from Kathmandu, or multiple flights/drives.
• Still substantial costs: The permit fee is only a part of total expedition cost; travel, gear, logistics may dominate budget. Expert commentary warns that the waiver of a few hundred dollars in royalty will not in itself make a remote expedition cheap.
• Time-limited: The waiver is only for two years, after which normal permit fees may apply again. Climbers should plan accordingly.
• List specificity: Not all peaks are necessarily included in the 97; climbers must verify that their desired peak is part of the waiver list.

FAQ: Common questions about “Nepal waives climbing permit fees for 97 peaks”

Q: Does this mean I can climb one of the 97 peaks totally free of charge?
A: Not entirely. It means the government royalty/permit fee is waived. You will still need to cover guide/porter costs, insurance, travel, logistics, equipment, and other expedition expenses.

Q: Which peaks are included in the 97-list?
A: The full list has not always been widely published, but we know the peaks range from ~5,870 m to ~7,132 m and are located in Karnali and Sudurpashchim provinces. For example, peaks like Api Himal (7,132 m) are among them.

Q: Is this waiver permanent?
A: No — the policy is set for two years. After that, standard permit fees may return unless the government extends the policy or modifies it.

Q: Will this reduce overcrowding on Everest and other peaks?
A: That is one of the goals of the policy. By raising fees on Everest and offering free/waived permits on other peaks, Nepal hopes to redistribute climbers. Whether the effect will be large depends on how many climbers choose the remote western peaks.

Q: Should I hurry to climb one of these peaks now?
A: If you are interested in climbing a remote peak in western Nepal, yes—it makes sense to plan soon while the waiver is in effect. But also assess logistics, experience level, expedition budget and support.

Strategic advice for expedition planners

If you’re a mountaineer or expedition operator thinking: “So Nepal waives climbing permit fees for 97 peaks — how do I exploit this?”, here are strategic pointers:

1. Select your peak carefully
   Choose a peak included in the waiver list. Cross-check with a trusted local operator or the Nepal Mountaineering Association (NMA) or the Ministry of Culture, Tourism & Civil Aviation.
2. Investigate logistics in Karnali/Sudurpaschim
   Many of these peaks lie in remote zones with limited infrastructure. Assess approach (road/air), altitude acclimatisation, base camp access, rescue options and guides/porters availability.
3. Calculate full expedition cost
   Even with permit fee waived, costs like transportation, gear, food, staff, insurance can add up. Be realistic about budget and contingencies.
4. Factor in experience and season
   Some peaks may be technically challenging or under-resourced. Make sure your team has the skills, acclimatisation plan and support for remote alpine climbing.
5. Leverage marketing and novelty
   As the “Nepal waives climbing permit fees for 97 peaks” initiative gains attention, there may be opportunity to market a “hidden Himalayan gem” expedition. For adventure travel companies, this could be a selling point.
6. Community engagement and sustainability
   Since one goal of the policy is to benefit local communities, engage locally: hire local guides/porters, use local lodges, respect cultural/environmental norms. This strengthens the social licence and may increase local support.
7. Monitor renewal/extension of policy
   Since the waiver is time-bound (two years), check if the policy is extended or modified. Plan accordingly for fees, deadlines and permit applications.

Potential long-term ramifications for Nepali mountaineering

The “Nepal waives climbing permit fees for 97 peaks” policy could lead to several longer-term changes:

• New climbing routes & alternate hubs: The western Himalayas may become more popular, leading to new base camps, lodges and tourist infrastructure.
• Reduced pressure on Everest/Annapurna regions: If climbers shift into the less-crowded zones, environmental and logistical burdens on the most popular peaks may ease.
• Greater regional equity: By bringing mountaineering income to under-developed provinces, the tourism benefit may spread more evenly across Nepal.
• Training ground for serious climbers: If the proposed 7,000 m summit-before-Everest rule is implemented, some of these waived peaks may play a bigger role in climber progression.
• Increased competition: As more climbers attempt these remote peaks, the “undiscovered” status may diminish, and fees or regulations may evolve accordingly.
• Infrastructure development necessity: The success of the initiative will depend on improving access, safety, accommodation and logistical support in remote areas — a major challenge and cost.

Challenges and criticisms

While the policy is bold and promising, a number of criticisms and concerns have been raised:

• Some mountaineers argue that the royalty fee waiver won’t significantly change expedition costs, because the royalty was only a small proportion of overall cost.
• Others point out that infrastructure is the real obstacle, not permit fees. Remote western Nepal suffers from poor roads, limited flight connectivity, less search/rescue capability and minimal support.
• Some operators worry that the influx of climbers, if unsupported, may lead to negative impacts (environmental, cultural) on these fragile regions.
• Since the waiver is limited to two years, there is concern about what happens when the period ends: Will fees rebound? Will momentum be lost?
• Marketing and awareness: Many international climbers may simply not know about the opportunity or may still prefer the prestige of climbing Everest or Annapurna, limiting the shift.

Conclusion

In summary:
The decision that “Nepal waives climbing permit fees for 97 peaks” is a strategic and significant move by the Nepali government. It offers climbers new opportunities in less-visited regions and holds the promise of distributing tourism benefits more broadly within Nepal. Yet the opportunity comes with practical caveats — remote access, full expedition costs, support infrastructure and time-limited nature of the policy. For serious climbers and expedition planners, these waived-permit peaks represent an intriguing alternative to the well-trod routes.

If you’re considering an expedition under this policy, begin planning soon: select your peak, assemble your team, assess costs and logistics, and leverage the novelty while it lasts. For Nepal, the success of this initiative may depend on how well the remote regions can scale up to meet increased interest—both in terms of support and sustainability.

Name *

First

Last

Name Message or

Email *

Comment or Message *

Submit